Tuesday 17 September 2013

Madras Cafe - Movie Review

Starring : John Abraham, Nagris Fakhri,Prakash Belawade, Siddhartha Basu & Ajay Rathnam
Directed by Shoojit Sircar
Music by Shantanu Moitra
Release Date : August 23th 2013 (Not released in Tamil Nadu)


As I am writing this review, I had read that this movie has been pulled off from the UK screens due to protests from some Tamil organizations. Exactly two weeks back, I had a Bengali friend who after watching this movie, had texted me and told me she never knew that ethnic Tamils had suffered so much in Sri Lanka. Is that not testimonial to prove that this movie is not Anti-Tamil ? Being a Tamilian, I did not find anything offensive about Sri Lankan Tamils in this movie. This movie shows us a glimpse of what ethnic Tamils had to endure in Sri Lanka.There is nothing offensive said about the LTTE chief too. In fact, he has been shown in positive light - I was all ears to the dialogues being said in this movie, especially about him. Nagris who plays a British journalist in the movie, remarks about the Tamil outfit leader in the middle of the movie that she has not meet someone who is determined and focused as him and she adds that he would continue fighting till he achieves his goal and also, that he cannot be bought with money. I honestly don't understand what some Tamil outfits found offensive in this movie and barred its release. Let's call a spade a spade. Let those Tamil outfits remember that even the great legend and martyr "Bhagath Singh" was labelled a terrorist by the Britishers.To Hell with Freedom of Speech and Expression in our country. 






                          In India, it requires courage to make a political movie based on true events and we should applaud the creators of this movie for this sole reason, and they have taken a very sensitive issue, of which many Indians, apart from most Tamils, are even not aware of. The Srilankan Tamils issue has never been portrayed by Bollywood and I believe this would be the first time it has been handled by Bollywood. The film starts off with a disclaimer that it is merely a work of fiction. All the names have been changed (LTTE is called the LTF; Anna is the leader of LTF and this character is based on Prabhakar) but the events of this movie are clearly based on the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka, which ultimately led to the assassination of our prime minister. In the movie, the plot moves along on excepted path and ends with the the assassination of a former prime minister. Major Vikram (John Abraham) is a RAW officer who is sent to Sri Lanka in a secret operation to broker peace in the country. The Indian government is shown taking sides and plans to supply arms to a particular Sri Lankan Tamil group, which is at loggerheads with the LTF, this is being done in order to capture Anna (Leader of the tamil outfit LTF - played by Ajay Ratnam) who is not ready to co-operate in the peace process and lay down arms as he is afraid that Sri Lankan government would butcher Tamil people after the Indian Army leaves the island. The Indian government wants to end the ethnic war by hook or by crook, and in the process prove it's regional supremacy but the operations go awry and get completely derailed due to some bloody betrayals. The LTF leader is targeted by the Indian Government, but he manages to escape, and emerges stronger. Then, the LTF leader eliminates all his rivals.

                 Vikram Singh does his role in the secret operations valiantly, making personal sacrifices, but fails when it matters most. But the story, is not about his character. This could well be John Abraham’s coming of age role. He looks wooden as always, but he fits in to the narrative quite aptly. Troubled, angry and helpless, frustrated yet committed to duty — he plays it all with maturity. Nargis Fakhri is not bad in her very small role as a foreign journalist. But the overall credit should go to the script, which manages such a complex plot. There are lots of Tamil dialogues in the movie and the actors speak proper Tamil (an oddity in a Hindi movie, Deepika Padukone - were you hearing?) which adds to the authenticity of the movie, given that they have chosen many small time Tamil actors in their cast. The movie has a big list of flaws and loses steam during the second half. This movie drags on during the later part of the second half and gets a tad melodramatic - it also confuses us during this phase. The climax - the assassination part is sure to bring about some nostalgia to people, who were around when the actual assassination took place. 

                          The film showcases that there are no true winners in a war and that the innocent civilians are always the ones who suffer the most. Sircar impressed everyone with "Vicky Donor" and he has again taken up a different genre and impressed us. The director is here to stay. This movie would not become a classic but it is definitely worth a watch. People like SRK should start thinking of making movies like this rather than dancing around in lungis !


What I feel 
My Rating - 6.75/10
Recommended movies which handle the same issue - The Terrorist, Cyanide and Kannathil Muthamittal


What the Internet says
  • Reviewing for the Hindustan Times, Anupama Chopra wrote "Madras Café works as an effective portrait of the futility of war. Shoojit Sircar and his writers, Shubhendu Bhattacharya and Somnath Dey, ably illustrate why there are no winners here. Ideologies are marred by corruption and brutality. Death is inevitable and victories, pyrrhic."
  • The Hindu praised director Sircar, saying "For long, Hindi films made us believe that it is only Pakistan that we have to deal with. Shoojit Sircar touches base with Sri Lanka and unravels the complex 'Tamil problem' as many living North of the Vindhyas call it. Keeping the jingoistic flavour aside, he plays the game of shadows as it is played with all its muck and grime."

Hand-Picked Trivia

  • The film was initially titled Jaffna after the northern Sri Lankan city.It was renamed Madras Cafe, as the plot to kill Rajiv Gandhi was hatched at the cafe.The original location of the cafe is not specified in the film.
  • “If I would have gone with this script to anyone else, they would have rejected it because of the kind of sensitivity the subject has. I don’t want to name them, but three of them have already done it. Nobody was ready to produce the film... it’s very daring of John Abraham and Viacom 18 Motion Pictures to back up this project,” director Sircar told the press after the release of the film



1 comment:

  1. The film was good in terms of it's storyline and narration. And finally one decent product from Bollywood. The rest of the india are finally thrown a light about the Ethnic war in Srilanka.
    Tamil activists, political parties, students, theatre owners protested for the story as improper. The reason movie was not screened is b'coz of theatre owners who felt the same. They all saw the special screening and came to this decision.

    Okay, why Tamil activists, political parties, students, theatre owners felt this movie is sending wrong message ? Well, the movie is about Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. But, it has not even touched the most important reason behind this, and that is, what IPKF (Indian Peace Keeping force?) done to Tamil there. IPKF could not catch the Cheif and hence started the rape and killings of innocent civilians as cruel as Srilankan army. Hence they became 'Indian Peace KILLING Force'. This made the common men & women as well as LTTE, even more agitated about the Indian Leader who deployed the IPKF. The funny thing was even the Srilankan army invited LTTE to kick IPKF since they did not like IPKF authority on their soil. Then LTTE kicked the IPKF out of their country with field and guerilla wars.

    This movie has confusing scenes like, once Nagris, the British journalist, says LTF chief can't be bought with money and later says money is the deciding factor for the kill :)
    Calling Spade is Spade (Spade is director's choice) is not a concern, but freedom of speech should n’t be applied all the films(especially Tamil)? Then why the hell 'Freedom of Speech' not applied to Tamil films about the Ethic war in Srilanka?? That is the main reason of anger which fought and banned this movie in TN, to teach painful lesson to film censor and whomever controlling them.

    Bhagat Singh/Vaanji Nathan were named as ‘terrorist’ by British govt. but to India they are Patriotic Brave Men. The same can be applied to Prabhakaran, as he was named as ‘Terrorist’ by India but he is Savior and Leader by Tamils in Srilanka and rest of the world since at least he was able to extend 30 more years of life to the innocent victims/soldiers dies in the war.

    Many tamil movies were not given not given certificate to release and had heavy cuts and made to release after many years with no market value. It happened since they had some scenes about Srilankan and Indian Army's atrocity and LTTE's war against them. Wow... Where is the so called 'Freedom of Speech'?

    ReplyDelete

Please enter your comments